Infuse, Don’t Impose: A model for sustainable change in veterinary culture (#377)
- Rick LeCouteur
- Jul 21
- 2 min read

There is no exact match in existing leadership literature that mirrors the biomedical precision and internal diffusion principles of convection-enhanced leadership—which makes the metaphor original and powerful.
However, there are several leadership philosophies that share overlapping themes, particularly around targeted, embedded, and systems-aware approaches.
Here are a few that come close in spirit, though none quite capture the full analogy:
Servant Leadership
Core Idea: The leader serves from within the organization, focusing on the needs of others—especially team members.
Overlap: Emphasizes being embedded, listening, and building trust—parallel to internal placement of CED leadership.
Difference: Less about strategic diffusion or targeted influence—more about empathy and support.
Systems Thinking Leadership
Core Idea: Sees the organization as an interconnected system; interventions must consider ripple effects and feedback loops.
Overlap: Recognizes that localized issues may have systemic origins; aims to act at points of leverage.
Difference: More focused on mapping complexity than on infusing targeted influence directly into problem areas.
Transformational Leadership
Core Idea: Inspires and motivates teams by instilling shared purpose, vision, and cultural change.
Overlap: Can catalyze widespread change, especially if the leader is embedded.
Difference: Often works through charisma and vision—external motivators—rather than subtle, localized cultural infusion.
Adaptive Leadership (Heifetz & Linsky)
Core Idea: Mobilizes people to tackle tough challenges by encouraging internal learning and distributed responsibility.
Overlap: Recognizes that solutions must often emerge from within the organization, not from above.
Difference: Focuses more on navigating change and resistance than on precision or controlled delivery.
Change Agent / Embedded Leadership
Core Idea: Embeds individuals within teams to catalyze change from within (used in healthcare systems and education).
Overlap: Like a catheter in CED, these leaders are strategically placed to influence without disrupting.
Difference: Often temporary roles and not necessarily systemic or convection driven.
Why Convection-Enhanced Leadership Is Unique:
Existing Models | Convection-Enhanced Leadership |
Often top-down or vision-based | Embedded, internal, and pressure-driven |
Driven by empathy or systems logic | Driven by targeted, localized diffusion of influence |
Risk of collateral disruption | Minimizes damage to functional units ("healthy tissue") |
Focuses on people or systems broadly | Focuses on precise entry points and marginal outreach |
Rick’s Commentary
Convection-enhanced leadership stands apart by combining:
A biological metaphor with organizational application
The precision of targeted therapy
The intentional internal placement of influence
The avoidance of systemic disruption
It’s not just embedded leadership.
It’s leadership with deliberate infusion, real-time monitoring, and local therapeutic spread—exactly like the CED technique in brain tumor therapy.
Comments