Mars Incorporated is a global powerhouse in the pet care, confectionery, and food industries, owning brands like Pedigree, Royal Canin, M&M’s, Snickers, Orbit gum, and many others.
Through its Mars Veterinary Health division, the company has made significant sustainability claims, pledging to reduce its environmental impact while promoting pet wellness. (Environmental Sustainability Update https://marsveterinary.com/veterinary-sustainability/)
However, given Mars' broader operations, including chocolate production, chewing gum manufacturing, and pet food containing resource-intensive ingredients, one has to ask:
Is Mars truly committed to sustainability, or is there a disconnect between its veterinary health claims and its overall business practices?
Sustainability Commitments
Mars Veterinary Health states that it is taking steps to reduce carbon emissions, improve pet food sustainability, and support responsible sourcing of ingredients. Some of its key initiatives include:
Aiming for net zero carbon emissions by 2050.
Reducing the environmental footprint of veterinary hospitals by cutting waste and energy use.
Promoting sustainable sourcing of pet food ingredients, including efforts to limit overfishing and improve plant-based alternatives.
Advocating for better pet nutrition with responsibly sourced ingredients.
On the surface, these efforts align with a growing consumer demand for ethical and environmentally responsible businesses. But how do these claims hold up when considering Mars' broader business model?
The Contradictions
Chocolate and Deforestation: Mars, Inc. is one of the largest chocolate manufacturers in the world. The cocoa industry has long been associated with deforestation, unethical labor practices, and biodiversity loss. While Mars has pledged to source 100% certified sustainable cocoa by 2025, it has faced criticism over the slow progress in eliminating unsustainable supply chain practices.
Pet Food and Sustainability Concerns: Many Mars pet food brands, including Pedigree and Royal Canin, rely on animal protein, grains, and fish meal, which have significant environmental footprints. While the company has made moves toward alternative protein sources, large-scale pet food production still contributes to land and water resource depletion.
Chewing Gum and Plastic Waste: Mars also produces chewing gum brands such as Orbit and Extra. Most commercial gums contain synthetic polymers derived from petroleum-based plastics, contributing to microplastic pollution. While Mars claims to be improving sustainability across all its brands, plastic gum remains a major environmental issue.
Palm Oil and Environmental Impact: Mars has been a major buyer of palm oil, which is linked to deforestation in tropical regions. Although the company has made commitments to source RSPO-certified sustainable palm oil, watchdog organizations have pointed out gaps in transparency and enforcement across the supply chain.
"Greenwashing" or a Work in Progress?
It’s easy to label these contradictions as corporate hypocrisy. However, sustainability in a multinational business is often a complex and gradual process. Some key questions remain:
Are Mars' veterinary health sustainability efforts more of a marketing strategy than a real commitment?
Can a company truly be sustainable if major parts of its business contribute to environmental harm?
Is Mars using its veterinary division as a "green halo" to distract from its other industries?
At the same time, progress is being made, especially in sustainable pet nutrition and supply chain improvements. The challenge lies in whether Mars can align its entire business model with its environmental goals or if its sustainability efforts will always be overshadowed by its more resource-heavy operations.
In the words of Sir. Winston Churchill:
The farther back you can look, the farther forward you can see.
Rick’s Commentary
Mars Veterinary Health’s sustainability claims should be met with both cautious optimism and critical scrutiny.
While Mars Veterinary Health is taking steps in the right direction, their broader business model still raises serious environmental concerns.
Until Mars fully integrates sustainability across all its product lines,
from pet food to chocolate to gum,
the debate over corporate responsibility versus corporate hypocrisy will continue.
Comments