The Great Hedge of India: How empires enforce borders (#381)
- Rick LeCouteur
- Aug 2
- 3 min read

Long before the Berlin Wall or the US–Mexico border fence, the British built a living barrier across the heart of India. A hedge so vast it rivaled the Great Wall of China. This 12-foot-high wall of thorns wasn’t meant to keep out invaders. It was designed to enforce a salt tax that bled the poorest dry.
Forgotten for more than a century, the Great Hedge of India is a thorny reminder that borders are never just about land. They’re about power.
In the annals of colonial history, grand architectural projects, including railways, palaces, and bridges, are often celebrated as feats of engineering. But among the British Empire’s stranger undertakings in India was a 1,100-mile hedge that once stretched across the subcontinent. Nearly forgotten today, it was a living wall of thorns, conceived not for defense against armies or wild animals, but to protect one of the most resented taxes in colonial India: the salt tax.
By the late 1870s, the hedge was an imposing sight. In places it stood 12 feet tall and 14 feet wide, dense enough to halt even the most determined intruder. British officials compared it to the Great Wall of China. Built over decades with persistence bordering on obsession, it formed part of a larger 2,500-mile Inland Customs Line. Its purpose was simple and brutal: prevent untaxed salt from crossing into high-tax regions.
Salt, essential to life, was a commodity that the British knew could be exploited for revenue. The salt tax disproportionately hurt India’s poorest citizens, who spent a significant portion of their meager incomes on it. For the colonial administration, controlling salt was controlling the very lifeblood of the population. The Great Hedge was the physical embodiment of that control. A wall of thorns as much symbolic as practical, reinforcing the economic divide between the taxed and untaxed zones.
This was not defense in the traditional sense; it was economic enforcement through environmental manipulation. In the 1840s, British customs officers began piling thorny brush to block smugglers. Over time, they experimented with Indian plum, babool, prickly pear, and other hardy plants to create a permanent, self-renewing barrier. Each mile required 250 tons of thorny material; patrols sometimes hauled 100,000 tons in a year to repair dry stretches.
The hedge was plagued by natural enemies, including termites, locusts, vine infestations, and storms. In one section, rats took up residence, prompting patrols to release feral cats as an impromptu pest-control unit. Yet, for all its size and effort, smugglers still slipped through, flinging sacks of salt over the top, climbing trees, or exploiting barren gaps.
Its very existence reflects a deeper truth about colonial rule: imperial power was not sustained solely by grand proclamations or military might, but by relentless, everyday enforcement of economic exploitation. The hedge was a monstrous system, in the words of Sir John Strachey, a lifelong British civil servant in India, and it was emblematic of an empire willing to mobilize enormous human and material resources to preserve its revenue streams.
By 1879, the hedge’s time was up. It was expensive to maintain and shifting policies made it redundant. Funding was cut, and the hedge quickly faded into obscurity. More than a century later, British writer Roy Moxham stumbled upon a passing reference in an old colonial memoir and became obsessed with finding it. His two-year search uncovered only a single remnant. Thorny acacias and Indian plum trees guarding a raised embankment. He realized that much of the hedge’s path had been paved over and turned into roads.
Rick's Commentary
Today, the Great Hedge of India is barely a footnote in history books, but it remains a potent symbol.
It stands as a reminder that colonialism was not just about foreign flags over capitals. It was about control over the smallest necessities, enforced through physical and bureaucratic barriers that reshaped landscapes and lives.
The hedge may have vanished, but its story resonates in our own era.
Modern borders, whether fortified with steel, concrete, razor wire, or high-tech surveillance, still aim to control the flow of goods, people, and resources.
The US–Mexico border, for example, has become a contested space where political, economic, and humanitarian interests collide, much like the Inland Customs Line did in 19th-century India.
Then, as now, walls and barriers are as much about projecting authority and enforcing policy as they are about physically stopping movement.
The Great Hedge of India is a reminder that barriers, no matter how massive, are never just about the physical divide.
Barriers are about the power structures that put them there.
Comments