The Unseen Teacher: The Animal as the Fourth Educator (#322)
- RIck LeCouteur
- May 9
- 3 min read

Over the past decade, a quiet revolution has taken root in early childhood education: animals are increasingly being recognized not just as companions or classroom mascots, but as powerful pedagogical partners.
The idea of the animal as the fourth educator, builds deliberately on the groundbreaking educational philosophy of Loris Malaguzzi, founder of the Reggio Emilia approach.
Malaguzzi, an Italian educator and psychologist, transformed early childhood education in the postwar years by advocating for the rights, capacities, and expressive potential of young children. He believed that children possess “a hundred languages” through which they explore and express their ideas. Languages of movement, drawing, building, storytelling, music, and more. Central to his philosophy was the belief that children learn best in environments that are beautiful, rich, and responsive.
Perhaps one of Malaguzzi’s most enduring ideas was that of the environment as the third educator, after the two teachers present in the Reggio classroom. He envisioned the learning environment not as a passive backdrop but as a space that teaches, a dynamic and deliberate presence that communicates, provokes curiosity, and supports agency.
Now, educators and researchers are expanding this vision further, proposing that the animal, so often embedded in both family life and early learning settings, be recognized as the fourth educator.
A Pedagogical Force Too Long Overlooked
In many Western early childhood settings, animals are ever-present: guinea pigs in a terrarium, a classroom rabbit, a dog that visits for reading time, butterflies in a net enclosure, or even virtual fish swimming across an app screen. Their presence is so ordinary that it has become taken for granted. Yet the animal’s role as a teacher is profound.
Research shows that animals in early childhood environments enhance empathy, support emotional regulation, stimulate curiosity, and foster nonverbal communication.
These relationships blur the boundaries between self and other, helping children develop a deep sense of care, connection, and responsibility.
In family life too, animals are often a child’s first encounter with nonhuman companionship. Rich with lessons in joy, grief, patience, and interdependence.
Ecological Thinking in Early Learning
This recognition of animals as educators is unfolding at a time of heightened ecological awareness. As environmental crises mount, the call for reconnection with the natural world becomes more urgent. Children are growing up in a time when habitats are vanishing, and biodiversity is under threat. The classroom animal may be one of the first, most personal bridges to understanding that we are not alone on this planet.
In the past, Malaguzzi’s emphasis on environment revitalized early childhood architecture and design, reminding us that where we teach is as important as what we teach. We now hope the same can be said of who we learn with, human and animal alike. By intentionally recognizing animals as educators, we also broaden the ethical and esthetic scope of early learning environments.
Not All Animals Have Fur
The animal in contemporary childhood may be virtual, robotic, or symbolic.
Children bond with robotic pets like AIBO, nurture virtual animals in digital games, and speak emotionally of fictional animals in books and films. Research into these technologically mediated relationships suggests that while they can spark imagination and simulate care, they may lack the complexity and reciprocity of relationships with living beings.
What’s more, they challenge us to ask:
What constitutes an authentic relationship?
What are the consequences of replacing real animals with programmable facsimiles?
Rick’s Commentary
These considerations are not confined to the classroom. Animals influence children’s emotional landscapes in the home and beyond. They are confidantes, playmates, and protectors.
The words used to describe the state of the world’s animal populations, such as disappearing, threatened, endangered, suffering, wild, exploited, loved, hunted, and protected, are not abstractions.
These words reflect the deeply contradictory ways we treat the very beings we entrust with our children’s moral and emotional development.
We must move beyond nostalgia and novelty and begin to interrogate the ethical, pedagogical, and ecological dimensions of animal-child relationships.
How are these relationships mediated by culture, class, access, and belief?
How do we reconcile the therapeutic presence of animals in one setting with their exploitation in another?
How do we ensure that both children and animals benefit from their interactions?
In naming the animal the fourth educator, we do more than give the rabbit in the corner a new title. We elevate an entire category of relationship. We invite more research, more critical reflection, and more intentional practice.
In doing so, we open the door to a richer, more humane education.
An education that recognizes that learning to live together means learning to live with others, not just beside them.
Comments