Who Owns Your Vet (2)? Ownership, ethos, and veterinary care (#425)

When you walk into a veterinary clinic, you’re not usually thinking about who owns it.

You’re thinking about your dog’s limp, your cat’s cough, or your parrot’s plucked feathers.

You expect compassion, competence, and continuity.

What you don’t expect is that the clinic’s decisions about medicine, staffing, or even pricing may be influenced not by the veterinarians themselves, but by a distant corporate office or an investment fund whose primary obligation is to its shareholders.

Ownership Shapes Ethos

Ownership influences ethos. How medicine is practiced. How staff are treated. How prices are set. And how much independence veterinarians truly have.

A clinic owned by its veterinarians tends to prioritize relationships, mentorship, and long-term community trust.

A clinic owned by private equity or a multinational holding company, on the other hand, must answer to investors expecting quarterly returns.

That difference in accountability changes everything. What’s valued. What’s measured. And what’s rewarded.

Medicine or Metrics?

Veterinary medicine has always balanced art and science.

The art of empathy and the science of evidence.

When ownership changes hands, that balance can tilt. Corporate owners often introduce production metrics. Number of consultations per day. Average invoice value. Diagnostic conversion rates.

These tools can improve efficiency, but they can also nudge decision-making away from individualized care toward volume and profitability.

The risk is subtle but real.

Medicine begins to serve the spreadsheet rather than the patient.

The Hidden Cost of Efficiency

Private equity firms are masters of efficiency. They consolidate supply chains, centralize management, and streamline accounting.

But efficiency in medicine is not the same as compassion. When every minute is monetized and every procedure analyzed, the intangible begins to vanish. The quiet conversation with a worried pet owner. The gentle reassurance to a junior nurse.

These are not inefficiencies; they are the essence of veterinary care.

Staff and Soul

Ownership also affects the spirit of a workplace.

Independent practices often feel like extended families. Young graduates learn under experienced mentors. Nurses and receptionists feel their contributions matter. Decisions are made in the break room, not the boardroom.

Under corporate ownership, autonomy can erode. Wages and rosters may be dictated by centralized HR systems. Talented veterinarians leave not because they dislike animals, but because they no longer recognize the profession they entered.

The Price of Care

Then there’s the issue of cost.

Corporate clinics often have access to bulk purchasing and shared infrastructure.

Advantages that could, in theory, lower prices. But in practice, the opposite can occur. High acquisition prices and investor expectations demand aggressive revenue targets. Fees rise, and so does client frustration.

The veterinarian becomes the messenger of a system they didn’t design.

Why Transparency Matters

None of this is to say that all corporate ownership is bad or that all independent practices are perfect.

Scale can bring benefits. Better equipment. Continuing education. Mental health support.

But transparency is essential. Pet owners deserve to know who stands behind the clinic’s logo. Veterinarians deserve to know whose values they are being asked to uphold.

Rick’s Commentary

Ultimately, it’s not just who owns the clinic, it’s what that ownership means for animals, clients, and the profession itself.

Does the clinic exist to serve its community, or to serve its shareholders?

Does it prioritize care over cash flow, and integrity over incentives?

Veterinary medicine is, at its core, a profession built on trust.

And trust, once sold, is hard to buy back.

#bunyipsbooksbeyond