Executive Orders and Executive Committees: Power Without Proximity (#588)

There is a moment when a decision is made without those most affected ever being in the room.

In Washington, it is called an Executive Order.

In academia, it often arrives through an Executive Committee.

Different settings. Different stakes. But the underlying question is strikingly similar:

What happens when authority outruns participation?

The Nature of Executive Action

An Executive Order, issued by the President of the United States, is designed for decisiveness.

It is:

Swift

Centralized

Binding

United States Presidents have used executive orders to act in moments of urgency, bypassing the slower machinery of Congress.

Sometimes, this is necessary.

War

Crisis

Economic instability

But even in those moments, Executive Orders carry a tension.

They are powerful precisely because they are not deliberative in the traditional sense.

They do not emerge from broad consultation.

They emerge from authority.

The Academic Parallel

Now shift the scene from the White House to a conference room in a university.

A small group convenes: the Executive Committee.

The agenda is structured.

The timeline is tight.

The outcome, often, is already forming.

And then, a decision is made - about naming rights, philanthropy, institutional direction, or policy - before the broader community has meaningfully engaged.

No press conference. No national scrutiny.

Just a quiet email afterward:

“We are pleased to announce…”

The Similarity We Rarely Name

The comparison may feel uncomfortable, but it is worth making.

Executive Orders (Government)	Executive Decisions (University)
Centralized authority	Centralized committee
Rapid decision-making	Accelerated timelines
Limited prior consultation	Limited stakeholder input
Justified by urgency	Justified by opportunity
Publicly visible	Often internally opaque

The difference is not in structure. It is in visibility.

In government, executive power is debated, litigated, challenged.

In universities, it is often accepted - quietly, professionally, and with remarkable restraint.

The Problem of Proximity

The further decision-makers are from those affected, the more likely something subtle is lost:

Context

Nuance

Trust

Faculty understand curriculum in ways committees cannot fully replicate.

Staff understand operations in ways strategy documents cannot capture.

Students experience the institution in ways no briefing paper can convey.

When decisions are made without these voices, the result may still be efficient, but it is no longer fully informed.

And over time, that gap widens.

From Shared Governance to Executive Function

Universities have long distinguished themselves from corporations and governments through one defining principle: shared governance.

Shared governance is slower

Shared governance is messier

Shared governance is occasionally frustrating

But it is also:

More legitimate

More inclusive

More resilient

When decisions begin to mirror executive orders - centralized, expedited, insulated - shared governance begins to shift into something else:

Executive function without collective voice.

A Quiet Drift

This is not about any single decision. It is about a pattern.

A drift from:

Consultation to Communication

Participation to Notification

Governance to Administration

And like all drifts, it is gradual enough to go unnoticed, until it is no longer subtle.

A Final Question

Executive Orders are accepted in government because they are balanced by other powers: courts, legislatures, elections.

But in a university, what is the counterbalance?

If Executive Committees make decisions without broad consultation, and if the community has no meaningful mechanism to shape those decisions, then we must ask:

Are we practicing shared governance…or simply managing its appearance?

Closing Reflection

The issue is not whether leaders should lead. Of course they should.

The issue is whether leadership remains connected to the people it serves.

Because once decisions are made at a distance, even with the best of intentions, the institution begins, quietly, to drift.

And when that happens, the question is no longer procedural.

It becomes existential:

Who is the university for?

#bunyipsbooksbeyond