Veterinary Terminology: Part 2 - Dementia (#506)

Veterinary Terminology is a reflective series about the words veterinarians use. How they arise, how they drift, and how they quietly shape professional thinking. This is not a series about catching errors or enforcing purity. It is about noticing habit, distinguishing precision from convenience, and preserving the language that allows a profession to think clearly.

Veterinary medicine is built on language.

Not decorative language. Not comforting language. But working language.

Words that localize lesions, define mechanisms, constrain interpretation, and discipline thought.

When that language loosens, thinking loosens with it.

In recent years, one word has slipped quietly into common veterinary use, often with good intentions, and often without scrutiny:

Dementia.

Part 2 of the Veterinary Terminology series examines why the word dementia, though familiar and emotionally legible, is conceptually incorrect when applied to dogs, and why that matters.

What Dementia Means

Dementia is not a causal descriptor. It does not identify specific variables or factors that directly cause an outcome.

In human medicine, dementia is a syndrome, defined by decline across specific cognitive domains, including:

• Language,

• Executive function,

• Abstract reasoning,

• Memory, measured against human norms, and

• Loss of social, occupational, and legal autonomy.

It is diagnosed using human-specific neuro-psychological constructs, embedded in culture, language, self-reflection, and social role.

These are not merely absent in dogs.

They are not applicable to dogs.

To say this plainly:

Dogs cannot meet the diagnostic criteria for dementia.

Not because they are deficient, but because the construct itself is human-specific.

What Dogs Experience

Aging dogs may experience measurable cognitive and behavioral change.

These may include:

• Altered sleep–wake cycles,

• Changes in social interaction,

• Reduced responsiveness to learned cues,

• Spatial disorientation, and

• Increased anxiety or altered affect.

At the neuropathologic level, changes may include:

• Amyloid deposition,

• Oxidative stress,

• Neurotransmitter alterations, and

• Reduced cerebral perfusion.

These findings are real. They are important. They deserve careful attention.

The appropriate professional term for this constellation is Canine Cognitive Dysfunction (CCD).

A deliberately descriptive phrase that names what we observe without presuming what we cannot know.

Why the Word Dementia Persists

If the use of the word dementia in dogs is inaccurate, why does it endure?

It endures because it:

• Feels familiar,

• Signals seriousness,

• Anchors owner understanding to human experience, and

• Shortens explanations.

In the exam room, use of a metaphor can be useful.

In professional language, use of a metaphor can be dangerous.

The term dementia imports a human narrative into an animal experience that cannot be assessed by those measures. Loss of self. Identity erosion. Fear of mental disappearance.

The term reshapes expectations, emotions, and decisions, often without anyone noticing the shift.

This is not pedantry.

This is not an argument for linguistic purity or professional aloofness.

Veterinary medicine has always required dual fluency:

• Precision inward

  • Among professionals, in teaching, diagnosis, records, and scholarship.

• Translation outward

  • For clients, using accessible language grounded in accurate concepts.

The problem arises when translation becomes substitution.

When professionals begin to think, teach, and document using lay or borrowed terms, the internal conceptual framework erodes.

Students learn the shortcut but never acquire the structure it replaced.

This is not democratization.

It is conceptual drift.

A Revealing Comparison

We do not diagnose dogs with:

• Schizophrenia,

• Autism, or

• Major depressive disorder.

Not because dogs do not suffer or behave differently. But because those diagnoses are human constructs, inseparable from language, self-concept, and social cognition.

Dementia belongs in the same category.

Why This Matters Professionally

When terminology blurs:

• Diagnostic reasoning softens,

• Teaching loses anatomical and conceptual anchors,

• Case discussions drift toward narrative rather than mechanism, and

• The next generation inherits vocabulary without understanding.

A profession does not lose rigor overnight.

It loses rigor one substitution at a time.

What Precision Looks Like

Precision does not mean coldness.

It means:

• Saying Canine Cognitive Dysfunction in professional contexts,

• Describing observed behaviors, not inferred inner states, and

• Translating carefully for clients without corrupting the internal model.

Compassion and accuracy are not opposites.

They are partners when language is handled with care.

Why this Series on Veterinary Terminology Exists

This essay is not only about dementia.

It is also about a larger question:

What happens when familiar words quietly replace correct ones?

Because once terminology loosens, thinking follows.

And once thinking loosens, medicine does too.

In Part 3, we turn to anatomy:

Leg versus Limb

Veterinary Terminology is a series about safeguarding meaning.

Intended not to exclude, but to preserve, the intellectual tools that allow a profession to remain a profession.

#bunyipsbooksbeyond