Who Leads the Veterinary Profession: Academia, corporates, or no one? (#558)

These are deceptively simple questions:

Who is driving this new generation of veterinary professionals?

Who is motivating and encouraging them?

Are we missing such thought leaders altogether?

My answer may surprise some.

In my view, it should be:

The American Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC).

And yet, I am far from convinced that it is.

The Organization That Should Lead

The AAVMC exists precisely to occupy that space.

It convenes deans.

It shapes academic standards.

It influences accreditation discussions.

It brings together institutions responsible for training the profession.

If anybody is structurally positioned to define vision, articulate values, and guide the next generation, it is the AAVMC.

But positioning and performance are not the same thing.

At present, I do not see the AAVMC functioning as a bold, forward-facing intellectual driver of the profession.

It coordinates.

It communicates.

It supports conversations.

But it does not consistently project a clear, unifying, future-oriented philosophy for veterinary medicine.

And in that vacuum, something interesting has happened.

Leadership Has Fragmented

Students and young professionals today are shaped by multiple forces:

Corporate veterinary networks

Social media voices

Advocacy movements

Wellness culture

Diversity and inclusion initiatives

Industry sponsors

Individual academic mentors

Influential clinicians online

Some of these influences are constructive.

Some are commercial.

Some are ideological.

Many are siloed.

But none provide a coherent, profession-wide narrative.

The result is not chaos.

It is diffusion.

The Historical Model of Thought Leadership

Historically, veterinary thought leadership emerged from academic centers.

Not from press releases.

Not from marketing departments.

But from individuals who combined:

Scholarship

Clinical depth

Moral clarity

Public voice

They wrote. They challenged. They mentored. They articulated what the profession stood for.

They were not always comfortable figures.

But they were anchors.

Today, academic incentives often discourage that kind of intellectual risk-taking.

Deans are managing expansion.

Faculty are stretched thin.

Governance structures are cautious.

Compensation gaps widen between academia and private practice.

In that climate, thought leadership becomes administratively risky.

Meanwhile, Corporate Voices Grow Louder

Corporate entities have become far more agile in messaging and influence.

They sponsor awards.

They fund educational programs.

They underwrite conferences.

They shape narratives around what modern veterinary medicine looks like.

That is not inherently malign.

But it is structurally powerful.

If academia does not define the profession’s philosophical direction, others will.

And they will do so efficiently.

The Real Risk

The risk is not that veterinary medicine lacks talented leaders.

We have extraordinary clinicians. Extraordinary educators. Extraordinary advocates.

The risk is that they operate individually, not under a coordinated philosophical umbrella.

A profession without clearly articulated, academically grounded thought leadership risks drifting toward whichever force is:

Most popular

Most organized

Most funded

Most vocal

That is not cynicism.

It is structural reality.

What Should Thought Leadership Look Like Now?

If the AAVMC, or any central academic body, is to reclaim its role, it must do more than convene.

It must lead.

That means:

Articulating clearly what day-one competence truly means.

Defining the balance between GP and specialist training.

Addressing faculty shortages transparently.

Rewarding teaching excellence structurally.

Leading on diversity and inclusion beyond optics.

Setting thoughtful guardrails around corporate influence in education.

Offering a clear vision for veterinary medicine in 2035 and beyond.

Not reactively.

Proactively.

Perhaps the Deeper Question

The deeper question is not simply

Who are today’s thought leaders?

It may be:

Do we have the institutional courage to produce them?

Thought leadership is not born from caution. It is born from clarity.

If veterinary academia does not lead, someone else will.

And that future will not be shaped by accident.

The next generation is watching.

They are searching for coherence. For integrity. For integration between ideals and realities.

They deserve more than fragmented influence.

They deserve direction.

The question is whether we are willing to provide it.

#bunyipsbooksbeyond